
Engagement Vs Interaction
In the age of scrolls and swipes, we’ve mistaken noise for connection.
Every marketer wants engagement, but most are really chasing interaction—clicks, likes, saves, fleeting signals of attention that disappear as fast as they appear.
But here’s the truth: Interaction is activity. Engagement is impact. Interaction is mechanical.
Engagement is emotional.
The Seduction of the Superficial
Social dashboards are addictive. They reward us for being seen, not for being remembered.
In the pursuit of spikes and virality, brands often trade long-term personality for short-term performance. Posts become punchlines. Strategy becomes scheduling.
The tragedy? Most brands end up sounding identical—optimizing for interaction instead of identity.
When Metrics Hijack Meaning
It’s easy to forget that social media is a channel, not a strategy.
When marketing goals aren’t tied to business goals, “success” becomes a mirage.
A viral video means nothing if it doesn’t strengthen brand recall, positioning, or preference.
The objectives of marketing must be the objectives of social media too—awareness, trust, consideration, and relevance. Otherwise, you’re just renting attention you’ll never own.
The Real Engagement Equation
Engagement isn’t when someone double-taps your post.
It’s when they start seeing your brand as part of their world.
When your message lives beyond the feed—inside conversations, decisions, and memory.
Social media was never meant to be a treadmill of content. It was meant to be a stage for your brand’s voice, values, and story. So the next time you review your metrics, ask not “how many interacted?”
Ask: “how many cared enough to remember?”
You may also like
How To Talk To AI
The business leader's guide to AI orchestration
Why Before What
Sinek's Golden Circle proves purpose beats features every time
Coal, Carbon, and Computers
Climate Cost of the Digital Age